By the time I was writing about this story, I was feeling more conscious of packing ‘added value’ into these reviews. My thinking was that, although I was probably among the first Doctor Who fans to see the tales (courtesy of preview DVDs), my reviews were the last to be read, popping onto the newsagent’s shelves weeks after everyone’s dissected them online. So, I felt they needed an additional element, in the hope that would help them remain worth reading. A gimmick, really.
From DWM #422, this one is full of business. It sports a seemingly superfluous opening para, which is paid-off by a call back at the end. An old cheat. It’s superficially impressive, and gives the impression the whole thing’s been terribly well thought-out. Try it! I also covertly threaded a countdown device into the text (riffing off that bit in part two, when Amy does the same) and marked the relevant words in red for the benefit of Tom and Peter at DWM, so they could be assured these weird mispellings weren’t just typos. I’ve done that here too.
I was well-pleased with the final thing. Less so upon re-reading it now. You just kind of want it to get on with the job in hand. At the time of writing this blurb, I’m about to review ‘A Good Man Goes to War’, and I’m far more relaxed about differentiating my reviews with others online, even though this year, Den of Geek, Tachyon TV and SFX are publishing pieces both before and after stories air. Thing is, I hadn’t realised the implicit added value I already had: I’m lucky in that my reviews appear in DWM, the galaxy’s greatest mag. (See how, even here, I call back to my first line?) Continue reading →